vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EQUINOR ASA (EQNR) and RYDER SYSTEM INC (R). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EQUINOR ASA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0B vs $13.1B, roughly 2.0× RYDER SYSTEM INC). RYDER SYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -0.8%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EQUINOR ASA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs 1.0%).
Equinor ASA is a Norwegian multinational energy company headquartered in Stavanger, Norway. It is primarily a petroleum company operating in 36 countries with additional investments in renewable energy and lithium mining. In the 2020 Forbes Global 2000, Equinor was ranked as the 169th-largest public company in the world. In 2023, the company was ranked 52nd in the same list. As of 2021, the company has 21,126 employees.
Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.
EQNR vs R — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0B | $13.1B |
| Net Profit | $-204.0M | $93.0M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.4% | 1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -108.9% | -5.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $2.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $93.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-204.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $131.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $135.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $127.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $3.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $3.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $3.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.1B | $182.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.6B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $135.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $154.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2B | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $164.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.8B | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3B | $583.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $273.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $595.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $583.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $749.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $442.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $752.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $651.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $629.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $552.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $273.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $137.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-201.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-87.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | 5.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.84× | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
