vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $289.7M, roughly 1.2× ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 9.9%, a 28.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
ESE vs FRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $336.0M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 53.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 38.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | 103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $322.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $311.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | $309.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | $311.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $303.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $296.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $155.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $63.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $112.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $1.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $1.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $107.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $9.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | $123.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | $103.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $622.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $574.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $144.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $169.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 2.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | 8.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
