vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Koppers Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($432.7M vs $289.7M, roughly 1.5× ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 6.9%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs -9.3%). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($63.0M vs $28.5M). Over the past eight quarters, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
ESE vs KOP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $432.7M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $29.7M |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | 25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 11.5% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | -9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | 391.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $1.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | $432.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $485.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $504.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | $456.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | $477.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $554.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $563.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $249.1M | $497.6M |
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | $13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.8% | 19.3% |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $1.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.90 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | $928.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $574.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | 1.62× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $928.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | $977.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | $989.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $939.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | $989.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $877.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $574.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $545.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $526.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $498.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $488.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $532.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $509.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $505.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | 1.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 1.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 1.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | 1.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | $45.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | $28.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | 6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | 1.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | $67.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $74.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $-12.3M |
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | $37.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-38.6M |
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | -7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | -0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
