vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($289.7M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.1× KILROY REALTY CORP). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 6.3%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $63.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
ESE vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $249.1M | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.90 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.4M | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $11.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
