vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($289.7M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.1× LendingClub Corp). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 9.9%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 7.8%).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
ESE vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
LC
Segment breakdown not available.