vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD (ESLT) and QT IMAGING HOLDINGS, INC. (QTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
QT IMAGING HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.3M vs $5.8M, roughly 1.4× ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD). ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -16.8%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Elbit Systems Ltd. is an Israel-based international military technology company and defense contractor. Founded in 1966 by Elron, Elbit Systems is the primary provider of the Israeli military's land-based equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles. It is an important company within the defense industry of Israel.
QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. is a medical technology company that designs, manufactures and commercializes non-invasive medical imaging systems primarily for breast health diagnostics. It serves healthcare providers, clinics and medical institutions across key markets including North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on improving the accuracy and accessibility of diagnostic imaging for patients.
ESLT vs QTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.8M | $8.3M |
| Net Profit | $367.1K | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 24.3% | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -8.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -16.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 877.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 60.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.85 | $-1.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $367.1K | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-628.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 55.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | -39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -37.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -129.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -409.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | -108.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -109.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -397.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -72.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -46.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.85 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $265.4K | $10.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $90.7K | $10.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | $6.4M |
| Total Assets | $11.0M | $23.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | 1.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.7K | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-324.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $534.6K | $-3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $319.6K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $534.6K | $-878.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-979.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
