vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD (ESLT) and Zhibao Technology Inc. (ZBAO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.8M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.4× Zhibao Technology Inc.). ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -2.1%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Elbit Systems Ltd. is an Israel-based international military technology company and defense contractor. Founded in 1966 by Elron, Elbit Systems is the primary provider of the Israeli military's land-based equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles. It is an important company within the defense industry of Israel.
ESLT vs ZBAO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.8M | $4.1M |
| Net Profit | $367.1K | $-85.5K |
| Gross Margin | 24.3% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | -2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -79.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 3.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.85 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-85.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $367.1K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-88.3K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 35.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -9.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -10.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.85 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $265.4K | $3.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $90.7K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | $6.8M |
| Total Assets | $11.0M | $39.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $779.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.7K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $534.6K | $-241.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $319.6K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-241.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $534.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
