vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.5M vs $190.3M, roughly 1.3× Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 1.6%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 5.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Empire State Realty Trust is a leading real estate investment trust that owns, manages, and operates a portfolio of premium commercial, residential, and retail properties primarily in the New York City metropolitan area, including the iconic Empire State Building. It serves corporate tenants, retail partners, and residential occupants, focusing on sustainable property operations and long-term asset value growth.
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
ESRT vs GLDD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.3M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.0M | $12.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.6% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -35.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.2M | $256.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.7M | $195.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.3M | $193.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.1M | $242.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | $202.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.6M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.5M | $170.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $33.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $7.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $68.8M | $13.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $378.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $517.1M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $68.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.1M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.5M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.5M | $23.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $378.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $448.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $517.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $502.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $481.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $479.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $448.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $425.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $418.0M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $79.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $99.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $249.1M | $79.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.3M | $49.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $56.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $60.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.8M | $26.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.1M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-55.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.1M | $39.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.0M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.1M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5M | $-34.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.5% | -17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.6% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | -20.0% |
| Q1 26 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 99.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 84.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 30.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.74× | 6.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.72× | 2.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.35× | 5.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.27× | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.88× | -0.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.51× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.30× | 2.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESRT
| Rental revenue (1) | $166.1M | 87% |
| Observatory revenue | $18.5M | 10% |
| Other revenue and fees | $4.1M | 2% |
| Lease termination fees | $1.4M | 1% |
| Third-party management and other fees | $277.0K | 0% |
GLDD
Segment breakdown not available.
