vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($226.2M vs $190.3M, roughly 1.2× Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.). Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.6% vs 0.1%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Empire State Realty Trust is a leading real estate investment trust that owns, manages, and operates a portfolio of premium commercial, residential, and retail properties primarily in the New York City metropolitan area, including the iconic Empire State Building. It serves corporate tenants, retail partners, and residential occupants, focusing on sustainable property operations and long-term asset value growth.
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
ESRT vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.3M | $226.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.0M | $180.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.6% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -74.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.2M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.7M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.3M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.1M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.6M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.5M | $212.9M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.2M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.1% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $68.8M | $158.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $742.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $68.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.1M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.6M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.8M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.5M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.9M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.5M | $332.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $512.2M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $631.4M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESRT
| Rental revenue (1) | $166.1M | 87% |
| Observatory revenue | $18.5M | 10% |
| Other revenue and fees | $4.1M | 2% |
| Lease termination fees | $1.4M | 1% |
| Third-party management and other fees | $277.0K | 0% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.
