vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Essex Property Trust (ESS) and Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Essex Property Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($479.6M vs $255.2M, roughly 1.9× Hayward Holdings, Inc.). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 9.2%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hayward Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Essex Property Trust's revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs -5.3%).

Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.

Bartlett-Hayward Company was an American metalworking company with large foundry, fabrication, and construction business lines, located in Baltimore, Maryland. Founded in the 1830s, it was independent until 1925 and since 1927 was owned by Koppers, of which it remained a division long afterward.

ESS vs HAYW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ESS
ESS
1.9× larger
ESS
$479.6M
$255.2M
HAYW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
HAYW
HAYW
+6.0% gap
HAYW
11.5%
5.5%
ESS
Higher net margin
ESS
ESS
8.7% more per $
ESS
17.9%
9.2%
HAYW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ESS
ESS
Annualised
ESS
6.0%
-5.3%
HAYW

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Revenue
$479.6M
$255.2M
Net Profit
$85.7M
$23.4M
Gross Margin
70.0%
46.5%
Operating Margin
31.7%
16.6%
Net Margin
17.9%
9.2%
Revenue YoY
5.5%
11.5%
Net Profit YoY
-71.6%
63.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.24
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$255.2M
Q4 25
$479.6M
$349.4M
Q3 25
$473.3M
$244.3M
Q2 25
$469.8M
$299.6M
Q1 25
$464.6M
$228.8M
Q4 24
$454.5M
$327.1M
Q3 24
$450.7M
$227.6M
Q2 24
$442.4M
$284.4M
Net Profit
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$23.4M
Q4 25
$85.7M
$68.4M
Q3 25
$172.7M
$24.0M
Q2 25
$231.5M
$44.8M
Q1 25
$212.8M
$14.3M
Q4 24
$301.7M
$54.7M
Q3 24
$125.5M
$16.5M
Q2 24
$99.0M
$37.6M
Gross Margin
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
46.5%
Q4 25
70.0%
40.7%
Q3 25
69.2%
51.2%
Q2 25
70.7%
52.7%
Q1 25
69.6%
49.5%
Q4 24
70.0%
51.4%
Q3 24
69.5%
49.7%
Q2 24
70.8%
51.0%
Operating Margin
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
16.6%
Q4 25
31.7%
25.0%
Q3 25
44.5%
16.8%
Q2 25
59.5%
23.8%
Q1 25
55.3%
14.6%
Q4 24
67.0%
23.4%
Q3 24
28.6%
14.7%
Q2 24
31.1%
23.9%
Net Margin
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
9.2%
Q4 25
17.9%
19.6%
Q3 25
36.5%
9.8%
Q2 25
49.3%
15.0%
Q1 25
45.8%
6.3%
Q4 24
66.4%
16.7%
Q3 24
27.8%
7.3%
Q2 24
22.4%
13.2%
EPS (diluted)
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$0.11
Q4 25
$1.24
$0.31
Q3 25
$2.56
$0.11
Q2 25
$3.44
$0.20
Q1 25
$3.16
$0.06
Q4 24
$4.00
$0.26
Q3 24
$1.84
$0.07
Q2 24
$1.45
$0.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$76.2M
$230.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$11.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.5B
$1.6B
Total Assets
$13.2B
$3.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$230.7M
Q4 25
$76.2M
$399.1M
Q3 25
$66.0M
$448.3M
Q2 25
$58.7M
$365.1M
Q1 25
$98.7M
$181.3M
Q4 24
$66.8M
$196.6M
Q3 24
$71.3M
$274.2M
Q2 24
$55.2M
$215.1M
Total Debt
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$11.1M
Q4 25
$943.5M
Q3 25
$6.4B
$947.7M
Q2 25
$6.4B
$949.1M
Q1 25
$6.8B
$950.4M
Q4 24
$950.6M
Q3 24
$6.4B
$959.9M
Q2 24
$6.2B
$959.8M
Stockholders' Equity
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$5.5B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$5.6B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$5.6B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$5.6B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$5.5B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$5.4B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$5.5B
$1.4B
Total Assets
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$3.1B
Q4 25
$13.2B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$13.2B
$3.0B
Q2 25
$13.2B
$3.0B
Q1 25
$13.2B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$12.9B
$3.0B
Q3 24
$12.6B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$12.5B
$2.9B
Debt / Equity
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
0.01×
Q4 25
0.59×
Q3 25
1.15×
0.62×
Q2 25
1.14×
0.63×
Q1 25
1.22×
0.66×
Q4 24
0.67×
Q3 24
1.18×
0.70×
Q2 24
1.13×
0.71×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1B
$-150.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
12.53×
-6.45×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$-150.6M
Q4 25
$1.1B
$-26.9M
Q3 25
$342.6M
$94.6M
Q2 25
$216.1M
$194.2M
Q1 25
$281.5M
$-5.8M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$-63.7M
Q3 24
$316.2M
$65.9M
Q2 24
$218.9M
$287.0M
Free Cash Flow
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-35.8M
Q3 25
$87.2M
Q2 25
$187.3M
Q1 25
$-11.4M
Q4 24
$-70.4M
Q3 24
$59.1M
Q2 24
$282.3M
FCF Margin
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
Q4 25
-10.3%
Q3 25
35.7%
Q2 25
62.5%
Q1 25
-5.0%
Q4 24
-21.5%
Q3 24
26.0%
Q2 24
99.3%
Capex Intensity
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.5%
Q3 25
3.0%
Q2 25
2.3%
Q1 25
2.4%
Q4 24
2.1%
Q3 24
3.0%
Q2 24
1.7%
Cash Conversion
ESS
ESS
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
-6.45×
Q4 25
12.53×
-0.39×
Q3 25
1.98×
3.94×
Q2 25
0.93×
4.34×
Q1 25
1.32×
-0.41×
Q4 24
3.54×
-1.16×
Q3 24
2.52×
4.00×
Q2 24
2.21×
7.64×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons