vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP (EVC) and MATRIX SERVICE CO (MTRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATRIX SERVICE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $134.4M, roughly 1.6× ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP). MATRIX SERVICE CO runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -13.5%, a 13.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.6% vs 12.5%). ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP's revenue compounded faster (31.1% CAGR vs 12.6%).
Entravision Communications Corporation is an American media company based in Santa Monica, California. Entravision primarily caters to the Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino community and owns television and radio stations and outdoor media, in several of the top Hispanic and Latino markets. It is the largest affiliate group of the Univision and UniMás television networks. Entravision also owns a small number of English-language television and radio stations.
Matrix Telecom, Inc., operating as Matrix Business Technologies, Trinsic, Powered by Matrix, Excel Telecommunications and various other niche brands is a United States telecommunications firm that provides voice and data services to consumers and small and medium businesses as well as multi-location distributed enterprise markets. The firm also provides wholesale voice services to the telecommunications, wireless and cable industries.
EVC vs MTRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $134.4M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $-18.2M | $-894.0K |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 6.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.4% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.5% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.6% | 12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.7% | 83.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $134.4M | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $211.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.7M | $216.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.9M | $200.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.0M | $187.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.7M | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.2M | $166.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.2M | $-894.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.7M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.4M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.0M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-31.7M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.9M | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 54.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.0% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | -15.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.5% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.8% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -62.5% | -8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.53 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.63 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.55 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | $199.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $167.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.4M | $137.6M |
| Total Assets | $387.5M | $650.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | $199.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.4M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.3M | $224.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.1M | $185.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $156.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | $124.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.3M | $115.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.8M | $69.7M |
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $55.4M | $137.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.2M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.0M | $142.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $150.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.0M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.4M | $156.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.4M | $164.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.5M | $165.8M |
| Q4 25 | $387.5M | $650.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.6M | $598.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $418.0M | $600.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $435.8M | $613.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $487.3M | $513.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $557.3M | $470.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $569.6M | $451.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $805.0M | $440.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | $7.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.5M | $45.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.2M | $31.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.4M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.9M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.2% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 2.9% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVC
| Digital Advertising | $98.1M | 73% |
| Broadcast Advertising | $27.4M | 20% |
| Retransmission Consent | $6.3M | 5% |
| Other Product Or Services | $1.3M | 1% |
MTRX
| Storage And Terminal Solutions | $99.9M | 47% |
| Utility And Power Infrastructure | $75.4M | 36% |
| Process And Industrial Facilities | $35.3M | 17% |