vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP (EVC) and GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. (TV), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5B vs $134.4M, roughly 108.3× ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP). ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP runs the higher net margin — -13.5% vs -51.8%, a 38.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Entravision Communications Corporation is an American media company based in Santa Monica, California. Entravision primarily caters to the Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino community and owns television and radio stations and outdoor media, in several of the top Hispanic and Latino markets. It is the largest affiliate group of the Univision and UniMás television networks. Entravision also owns a small number of English-language television and radio stations.
"Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.", simply known as "Televisa", is a Mexican telecommunications and broadcasting company and the largest in Latin America A major Latin American mass media corporation, it often presents itself as the largest producer of Spanish-language content.
EVC vs TV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $134.4M | $14.5B |
| Net Profit | $-18.2M | $-7.5B |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.4% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.5% | -51.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $134.4M | $14.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $14.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.7M | $14.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-18.2M | $-7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $552.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-31.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 54.1% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.7% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.3% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -62.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.53 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.63 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.55 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $167.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $387.5M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $55.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $387.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $418.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $435.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $487.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $557.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $569.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $805.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVC
| Digital Advertising | $98.1M | 73% |
| Broadcast Advertising | $27.4M | 20% |
| Retransmission Consent | $6.3M | 5% |
| Other Product Or Services | $1.3M | 1% |
TV
Segment breakdown not available.
