vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP (EVC) and TRAVELZOO (TZOO), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($134.4M vs $22.5M, roughly 6.0× TRAVELZOO). TRAVELZOO runs the higher net margin — -13.5% vs -0.1%, a 13.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.6% vs 8.7%). ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $1.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP's revenue compounded faster (31.1% CAGR vs 1.1%).
Entravision Communications Corporation is an American media company based in Santa Monica, California. Entravision primarily caters to the Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino community and owns television and radio stations and outdoor media, in several of the top Hispanic and Latino markets. It is the largest affiliate group of the Univision and UniMás television networks. Entravision also owns a small number of English-language television and radio stations.
Travelzoo Inc. is an Internet company that publishes deals from more than 2,000 travel, entertainment and local businesses such as restaurants and spas. It has 28 million members in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific and 25 offices worldwide.
EVC vs TZOO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $134.4M | $22.5M |
| Net Profit | $-18.2M | $-20.0K |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 81.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.4% | 2.5% |
| Net Margin | -13.5% | -0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.6% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.7% | -100.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $134.4M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.7M | $23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.9M | $23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.7M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.2M | $22.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.2M | $-20.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.7M | $150.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-31.7M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.9M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 54.1% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.7% | 79.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.3% | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | 82.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.5% | 86.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.4% | 87.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.5% | 88.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.0% | 88.0% |
| Q4 25 | -15.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.8% | 25.4% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -62.5% | 19.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.53 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.63 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.55 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | $10.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $167.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.4M | $-7.5M |
| Total Assets | $387.5M | $45.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.02× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.4M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.3M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.8M | $16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $55.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.0M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.0M | $-462.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.4M | $966.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.5M | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $387.5M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.6M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $418.0M | $46.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $435.8M | $49.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $487.3M | $54.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $557.3M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $569.6M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $805.0M | $54.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $1.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.8% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.5M | $5.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-373.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.4M | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $-388.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.2% | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVC
| Digital Advertising | $98.1M | 73% |
| Broadcast Advertising | $27.4M | 20% |
| Retransmission Consent | $6.3M | 5% |
| Other Product Or Services | $1.3M | 1% |
TZOO
Segment breakdown not available.
