vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) and FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($38.5M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.5× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.3% vs -28.1%, a 56.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.3% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.8% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Sentient Technologies was an American artificial intelligence technology company based in San Francisco. Sentient was founded in 2007 and received over $143 million in funding at different points after its inception. As of 2016, Sentient was the world's most well-funded AI company. It focused on e-commerce, online content and trading.
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
EVLV vs FSP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.5M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $10.9M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | -20.7% | -27.9% |
| Net Margin | 28.3% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.3% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 169.2% | 14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $28.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.5M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.7M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.4M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | 48.4% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.8% | 59.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | 62.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.5% | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | 61.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.8% | -29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.0% | -78.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.9% | -29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.0% | -52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.7% | -68.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -98.8% | -24.0% |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -124.6% | -29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | -79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.0% | -30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -111.3% | -52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | -68.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | -24.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $30.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $28.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.4M | $607.0M |
| Total Assets | $304.4M | $892.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.9M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.0M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.4M | $607.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.2M | $615.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.7M | $624.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.1M | $633.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.7M | $655.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $665.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | $682.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.8M | $703.9M |
| Q4 25 | $304.4M | $892.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.3M | $901.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $280.4M | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.0M | $916.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.1M | $946.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.5M | $981.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $280.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $3.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -48.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 63.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-25.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $-648.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -50.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 63.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
