vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) and Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($38.5M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.2× Gloo Holdings, Inc.). Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.3% vs -116.9%, a 145.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Sentient Technologies was an American artificial intelligence technology company based in San Francisco. Sentient was founded in 2007 and received over $143 million in funding at different points after its inception. As of 2016, Sentient was the world's most well-funded AI company. It focused on e-commerce, online content and trading.
EVLV vs GLOO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.5M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $10.9M | $-38.0M |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.7% | -82.0% |
| Net Margin | 28.3% | -116.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 169.2% | 12.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-6.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $-38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | -82.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -98.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -124.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -111.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $-6.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $15.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $28.6M | $176.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.4M | $-444.4M |
| Total Assets | $304.4M | $206.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $176.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.4M | $-444.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $304.4M | $206.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $280.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $280.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $-63.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-63.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -194.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $-63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -194.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVLV
Segment breakdown not available.
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
