vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) and Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($38.5M vs $32.0M, roughly 1.2× Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.). Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.3% vs -0.4%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.3% vs -0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.8% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Sentient Technologies was an American artificial intelligence technology company based in San Francisco. Sentient was founded in 2007 and received over $143 million in funding at different points after its inception. As of 2016, Sentient was the world's most well-funded AI company. It focused on e-commerce, online content and trading.
EVLV vs SAMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.5M | $32.0M |
| Net Profit | $10.9M | $-120.0K |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.7% | -2.8% |
| Net Margin | 28.3% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.3% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 169.2% | -107.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.9M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $-120.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $618.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -98.8% | 19.5% |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -124.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -111.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $44.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $28.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.4M | $50.3M |
| Total Assets | $304.4M | $166.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.9M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.0M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $39.7M |
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.4M | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.2M | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.7M | $64.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.1M | $80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.7M | $80.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $84.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.8M | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | $304.4M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.3M | $157.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $280.4M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.0M | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.1M | $194.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.5M | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.1M | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $280.0M | $170.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $18.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 46.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | $-24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-25.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-24.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -80.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 62.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -81.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.31× | 6.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVLV
Segment breakdown not available.
SAMG
| Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service | $30.7M | 96% |
| Tax And Family Office Services | $1.2M | 4% |
