vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evercore Inc. (EVR) and PHINIA INC. (PHIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evercore Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $889.0M, roughly 1.6× PHINIA INC.). On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs 6.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
PHINIA Inc. is a global automotive technology provider specializing in fuel injection systems, starters, alternators, and hybrid/electric vehicle components. It serves OEMs and aftermarket customers across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and key markets, covering passenger car, commercial vehicle and industrial mobility segments.
EVR vs PHIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $889.0M |
| Net Profit | $322.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.8% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 100.3% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.20 | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $889.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $908.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.0M | $890.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.0M | $796.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.5M | $833.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.4M | $839.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.4M | $868.0M |
| Q1 26 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $31.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $14.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | $7.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.80 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.41 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.48 | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.32 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.81 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $359.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $970.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $349.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $347.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $373.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $484.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $477.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $339.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $970.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $990.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $990.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $989.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $988.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $987.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $821.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $96.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $67.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $188.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.9M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-549.7M | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $686.4M | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $109.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $798.6M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.5M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.7M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.1M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.7M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.88× | 9.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.50× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.76× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.99× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.72× | 7.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
PHIN
| Customer | $618.0M | 70% |
| Fuel Systems | $194.0M | 22% |
| Other | $77.0M | 9% |
