vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evercore Inc. (EVR) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evercore Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $704.9M, roughly 2.0× SM Energy Co). On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs 12.2%).
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
EVR vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $322.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 100.3% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.20 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.0M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.0M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.5M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.4M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.4M | $634.6M |
| Q1 26 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.2M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $210.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | $7.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.80 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.41 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.48 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.32 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.81 | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $487.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $6.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.9M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-549.7M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $686.4M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $476.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $798.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.88× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.50× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.76× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.99× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.72× | 2.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
