vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evercore Inc. (EVR) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.8× Evercore Inc.). Evercore Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.0% vs 22.4%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs 29.9%).
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
EVR vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $322.7M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 100.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.1% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.20 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.5M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.4M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.2M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $7.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.80 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.41 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.48 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.32 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.81 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.9M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-549.7M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $686.4M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $798.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.5M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.7M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.3M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.1M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.7M | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.88× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.76× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.99× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.72× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
