vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evercore Inc. (EVR) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.3× Evercore Inc.). Evercore Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.0% vs 12.8%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs 4.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
Williams Sonoma is an American retailer of cookware, appliances, and home furnishings. It is owned by Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and was founded by Charles E. (Chuck) Williams in 1956.
EVR vs WSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $322.7M | $241.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 100.3% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.1% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.20 | $1.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.4M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | $241.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.2M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $249.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $265.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | $7.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.80 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.41 | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.48 | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.32 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.81 | $4.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $884.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | — | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $884.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $985.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $826.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $5.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $316.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $248.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | $316.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.9M | $282.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-549.7M | $633.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $686.4M | $253.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $246.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $226.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $798.6M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.5M | $230.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.7M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.3M | $566.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.1M | $170.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.7M | $187.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.4% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.88× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.50× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.76× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.99× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.72× | 0.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
WSM
Segment breakdown not available.
