vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.0× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 6.5%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 5.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
EVRG vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
