vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Evergy runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 5.0%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
EVRG vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.7M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.53 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.7M | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.3M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-301.3M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.5% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.3% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.59× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
