vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $745.1M, roughly 1.7× Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 6.5%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs 5.3%). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.6M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. operates a network of premium athletic, fitness and wellness destinations across the United States. It offers diverse services including state-of-the-art gym facilities, group exercise classes, personal training, spa treatments, nutrition coaching, youth programs and co-working spaces for consumers pursuing holistic healthy lifestyles.
EVRG vs LTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $745.1M |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $123.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 17.4% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $745.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $782.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $761.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $706.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $663.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $693.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $667.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $596.7M |
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $102.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.7M | $24.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.1% |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.53 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $204.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $204.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $120.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.7M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3B | $7.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | $239.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | $-64.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 40.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | $-21.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $239.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $195.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $183.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $163.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $170.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.3M | $90.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $41.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-301.3M | $-66.4M |
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.5% | -11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.3% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 2.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | 2.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 3.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 3.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.59× | 3.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
LTH
| Membership | $535.1M | 72% |
| In Center | $191.2M | 26% |
| Other | $18.8M | 3% |
