vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.3× Evergy). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 6.5%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs 5.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
EVRG vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
