vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.9× Evergy). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 6.5%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 5.3%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
EVRG vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.7M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.53 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.7M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.3M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-301.3M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.5% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.3% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.59× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
