vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EXACT SCIENCES CORP (EXAS) and FLOWSERVE CORP (FLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLOWSERVE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $878.4M, roughly 1.4× EXACT SCIENCES CORP). FLOWSERVE CORP runs the higher net margin — -2.4% vs -9.8%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EXACT SCIENCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 3.5%). EXACT SCIENCES CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($120.4M vs $-25.6M). Over the past eight quarters, EXACT SCIENCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (17.4% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Exact Sciences Corporation is an American molecular diagnostics company based in Madison, Wisconsin, specializing in the detection of early-stage cancers. The company provides products for the detection and prevention of colorectal cancer, including Cologuard, the first stool DNA test for colorectal cancer, along with additional screening and precision oncological tests for other types of cancer.
The Flowserve Corporation is an American multinational corporation and one of the largest suppliers of industrial and environmental machinery such as pumps, valves, end face mechanical seals, automation, and services to the power, oil, gas, chemical and other industries. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, which is in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, Flowserve employs close to 16,000 employees in more than 50 countries. Flowserve sells products and offers aftermarket services to engineering and c...
EXAS vs FLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $878.4M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-86.0M | $-29.0M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.4% | 3.5% |
| Net Margin | -9.8% | -2.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 3.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 90.1% | -137.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $878.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $850.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $811.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $706.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $708.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $699.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $637.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-86.0M | $-29.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.6M | $219.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $81.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-101.2M | $73.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-864.6M | $77.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-38.2M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.8M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-110.2M | $74.2M |
| Q4 25 | 70.1% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.6% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.3% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.8% | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.4% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.8% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.0% | 31.2% |
| Q4 25 | -9.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -122.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.7% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | -9.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.3% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -121.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.3% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $1.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.54 | $0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.69 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.60 | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $964.7M | $760.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.9B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $964.7M | $760.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $858.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $786.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $675.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $946.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $652.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $151.7M | $-174.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.4M | $-25.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.7% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $356.8M | $435.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.7M | $-174.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.9M | $401.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $154.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.8M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $197.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.7M | $178.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-82.3M | $62.3M |
| Q4 25 | $120.4M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | $384.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $137.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-365.0K | $-61.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $168.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.6M | $154.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.2M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-120.0M | $48.6M |
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.8% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXAS
| Screening | $695.1M | 79% |
| Precision Oncology | $183.2M | 21% |
FLS
| Aftermarket Equipment | $563.4M | 46% |
| FCD | $390.3M | 32% |
| Original Equipment | $268.5M | 22% |
