vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLOWSERVE CORP (FLS) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.0× FLOWSERVE CORP). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs -2.4%, a 23.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FLOWSERVE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.5% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $-25.6M). Over the past eight quarters, FLOWSERVE CORP's revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs 2.0%).
The Flowserve Corporation is an American multinational corporation and one of the largest suppliers of industrial and environmental machinery such as pumps, valves, end face mechanical seals, automation, and services to the power, oil, gas, chemical and other industries. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, which is in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, Flowserve employs close to 16,000 employees in more than 50 countries. Flowserve sells products and offers aftermarket services to engineering and c...
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
FLS vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-29.0M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | -2.4% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.5% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -137.4% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-29.0M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.6M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.8M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.9M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.6M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.2M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.56 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $760.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $760.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $675.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-174.0K | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-25.6M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $435.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-174.0K | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $401.8M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.9M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.3M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.5M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.8M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.3M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-25.6M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.7M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.5M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-61.7M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.5M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.6M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.5M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.6M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.68× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.55× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.18× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLS
| Aftermarket Equipment | $563.4M | 46% |
| FCD | $390.3M | 32% |
| Original Equipment | $268.5M | 22% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
