vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EXACT SCIENCES CORP (EXAS) and TransUnion (TRU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TransUnion is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $878.4M, roughly 1.3× EXACT SCIENCES CORP). TransUnion runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs -9.8%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EXACT SCIENCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 13.0%). TransUnion produced more free cash flow last quarter ($222.8M vs $120.4M). Over the past eight quarters, EXACT SCIENCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (17.4% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Exact Sciences Corporation is an American molecular diagnostics company based in Madison, Wisconsin, specializing in the detection of early-stage cancers. The company provides products for the detection and prevention of colorectal cancer, including Cologuard, the first stool DNA test for colorectal cancer, along with additional screening and precision oncological tests for other types of cancer.
TransUnion is an American consumer credit reporting agency. TransUnion collects and aggregates information on over one billion individual consumers in over thirty countries including "200 million files profiling nearly every credit-active consumer in the United States". Its customers include over 65,000 businesses. Based in Chicago, Illinois, TransUnion's 2014 revenue was US$1.3 billion. It is the smallest of the three largest credit agencies, along with Experian and Equifax.
EXAS vs TRU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $878.4M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-86.0M | $101.1M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9.4% | 17.4% |
| Net Margin | -9.8% | 8.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 13.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 90.1% | 52.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $878.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $850.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $811.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $706.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $708.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $699.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $637.5M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-86.0M | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.6M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $109.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-101.2M | $148.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-864.6M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-38.2M | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.8M | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-110.2M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -9.4% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.0% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -122.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.7% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | -9.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -121.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.3% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.45 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.54 | $0.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.69 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.60 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $964.7M | $856.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.9B | $11.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $964.7M | $856.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $752.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $858.4M | $690.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $786.2M | $612.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $682.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $646.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $946.8M | $545.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $652.1M | $436.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $11.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $151.7M | $319.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.4M | $222.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.7% | 19.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 8.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $356.8M | $661.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.7M | $319.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.9M | $324.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $291.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.8M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $254.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.7M | $229.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $295.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-82.3M | $54.0M |
| Q4 25 | $120.4M | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | $240.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-365.0K | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $136.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.6M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.2M | $226.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-120.0M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.8% | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXAS
| Screening | $695.1M | 79% |
| Precision Oncology | $183.2M | 21% |
TRU
Segment breakdown not available.
