vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Expand Energy (EXE) and 3M (MMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

3M is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.8× Expand Energy). Expand Energy runs the higher net margin — 16.9% vs 10.8%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Expand Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.5% vs 1.3%). 3M produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0B vs $215.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Expand Energy's revenue compounded faster (29.6% CAGR vs -1.8%).

Expand Energy Corporation is the largest independent natural gas producer in the U.S., based on net daily production. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the company operates in the Appalachian Basin of the Marcellus Formation in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, as well as the Haynesville Shale in Northwestern Louisiana.

The 3M Company is an American multinational conglomerate operating in the fields of industry, worker safety, and consumer goods. Based in the Saint Paul suburb of Maplewood, the company produces over 60,000 products, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection film, electrical, electronic connecting, insulating materials, car-care products, electronic circuits, and optical films. Among its best-known consume...

EXE vs MMM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MMM
MMM
1.8× larger
MMM
$6.0B
$3.3B
EXE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EXE
EXE
+62.2% gap
EXE
63.5%
1.3%
MMM
Higher net margin
EXE
EXE
6.1% more per $
EXE
16.9%
10.8%
MMM
More free cash flow
MMM
MMM
$1.8B more FCF
MMM
$2.0B
$215.0M
EXE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EXE
EXE
Annualised
EXE
29.6%
-1.8%
MMM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Revenue
$3.3B
$6.0B
Net Profit
$553.0M
$653.0M
Gross Margin
40.7%
Operating Margin
22.8%
23.2%
Net Margin
16.9%
10.8%
Revenue YoY
63.5%
1.3%
Net Profit YoY
238.6%
-41.5%
EPS (diluted)
$2.33
$1.23

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$6.0B
Q4 25
$3.3B
$6.1B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$6.5B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$6.3B
Q1 25
$2.2B
$6.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
$6.0B
Q3 24
$648.0M
$6.3B
Q2 24
$6.3B
Net Profit
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$653.0M
Q4 25
$553.0M
$577.0M
Q3 25
$547.0M
$834.0M
Q2 25
$968.0M
$723.0M
Q1 25
$-249.0M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$-399.0M
$728.0M
Q3 24
$-114.0M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.1B
Gross Margin
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
40.7%
Q4 25
33.6%
Q3 25
41.8%
Q2 25
42.5%
Q1 25
41.6%
Q4 24
51.7%
Q3 24
42.1%
Q2 24
42.9%
Operating Margin
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
23.2%
Q4 25
22.8%
13.0%
Q3 25
24.4%
22.2%
Q2 25
34.4%
18.0%
Q1 25
-12.2%
20.9%
Q4 24
-19.3%
12.2%
Q3 24
-23.9%
20.9%
Q2 24
20.3%
Net Margin
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
10.8%
Q4 25
16.9%
9.4%
Q3 25
18.4%
12.8%
Q2 25
26.2%
11.4%
Q1 25
-11.3%
18.7%
Q4 24
-19.9%
12.1%
Q3 24
-17.6%
21.8%
Q2 24
18.3%
EPS (diluted)
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$1.23
Q4 25
$2.33
$1.07
Q3 25
$2.28
$1.55
Q2 25
$4.02
$1.34
Q1 25
$-1.06
$2.04
Q4 24
$-2.15
$1.33
Q3 24
$-0.85
$2.48
Q2 24
$2.07

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$616.0M
$3.7B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.0B
$10.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$18.6B
$3.3B
Total Assets
$28.3B
$35.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.27×
3.29×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$3.7B
Q4 25
$616.0M
Q3 25
$613.0M
Q2 25
$731.0M
Q1 25
$349.0M
Q4 24
$317.0M
Q3 24
$1.0B
Q2 24
Total Debt
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$10.9B
Q4 25
$5.0B
$12.6B
Q3 25
$5.0B
$12.6B
Q2 25
$5.1B
$13.1B
Q1 25
$5.2B
$13.5B
Q4 24
$5.7B
$13.0B
Q3 24
$13.2B
Q2 24
$13.1B
Stockholders' Equity
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$3.3B
Q4 25
$18.6B
$4.7B
Q3 25
$18.1B
$4.6B
Q2 25
$17.9B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$17.2B
$4.5B
Q4 24
$17.6B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$10.2B
$4.6B
Q2 24
$3.9B
Total Assets
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$35.4B
Q4 25
$28.3B
$37.7B
Q3 25
$27.6B
$37.6B
Q2 25
$27.8B
$38.0B
Q1 25
$27.9B
$40.0B
Q4 24
$27.9B
$39.9B
Q3 24
$13.4B
$40.9B
Q2 24
$43.4B
Debt / Equity
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
3.29×
Q4 25
0.27×
2.68×
Q3 25
0.28×
2.72×
Q2 25
0.29×
3.06×
Q1 25
0.30×
3.02×
Q4 24
0.32×
3.40×
Q3 24
2.84×
Q2 24
3.34×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$956.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$215.0M
$2.0B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.6%
33.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
22.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.73×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.8B
$3.7B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$956.0M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$-954.0M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$-79.0M
Q4 24
$382.0M
$1.8B
Q3 24
$422.0M
$-1.8B
Q2 24
$1.0B
Free Cash Flow
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$215.0M
$1.3B
Q3 25
$426.0M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$665.0M
$-1.2B
Q1 25
$533.0M
$-315.0M
Q4 24
$-154.0M
$1.5B
Q3 24
$124.0M
$-2.0B
Q2 24
$752.0M
FCF Margin
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
33.6%
Q4 25
6.6%
21.8%
Q3 25
14.4%
23.6%
Q2 25
18.0%
-18.3%
Q1 25
24.3%
-5.3%
Q4 24
-7.7%
25.4%
Q3 24
19.1%
-32.3%
Q2 24
12.0%
Capex Intensity
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
Q4 25
22.6%
4.0%
Q3 25
26.1%
3.3%
Q2 25
17.8%
3.3%
Q1 25
25.6%
4.0%
Q4 24
26.8%
4.8%
Q3 24
46.0%
3.9%
Q2 24
4.3%
Cash Conversion
EXE
EXE
MMM
MMM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.73×
2.74×
Q3 25
2.20×
2.11×
Q2 25
1.37×
-1.32×
Q1 25
-0.07×
Q4 24
2.50×
Q3 24
-1.30×
Q2 24
0.89×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EXE
EXE

Oil And Gas$2.3B70%
Natural Gas Marketing Sales$734.0M22%
Natural Gas Liquids Sales$174.0M5%
Natural Gas Liquids Marketing Sales$34.0M1%
Oil Marketing Sales$31.0M1%

MMM
MMM

Safety and Industrial business segment$2.9B49%
Transportation and Electronics business segment$1.8B31%
Consumer business segment$1.1B19%
Corporate$121.0M2%

Related Comparisons