vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EXELIXIS, INC. (EXEL) and GATX CORP (GATX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EXELIXIS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($598.7M vs $436.7M, roughly 1.4× GATX CORP). EXELIXIS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 40.8% vs 18.1%, a 22.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GATX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, EXELIXIS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.7% CAGR vs 6.3%).
Exelixis, Inc. is a genomics-based drug discovery company located in Alameda, California, and the producer of Cometriq, a treatment approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for medullary thyroid cancer with clinical activity in several other types of metastatic cancer.
GATX Corporation is a railcar lessor that owns fleets in North America, Europe, and Asia. In addition, jointly with Rolls-Royce Limited, it owns one of the largest aircraft spare engine lease portfolios. It is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. As of December 31, 2020, the company owned 148,939 rail cars, including 83,959 tank cars, 64,980 freight cars, and 645 locomotives. Other major car types owned include covered hoppers, open-top hopper cars, and gondolas. It primarily serves the petrol...
EXEL vs GATX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $598.7M | $436.7M |
| Net Profit | $244.5M | $79.1M |
| Gross Margin | 95.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 39.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 40.8% | 18.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.6% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 74.8% | 0.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.89 | $2.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $598.7M | $436.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $597.8M | $449.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.3M | $439.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.4M | $430.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.8M | $421.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $413.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.5M | $405.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $637.2M | $386.7M |
| Q1 26 | $244.5M | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.6M | $97.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.8M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.6M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.9M | $78.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.0M | $89.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.1M | $44.4M |
| Q1 26 | 95.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 96.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 96.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 96.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 96.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 97.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 10.9% |
| Q1 26 | 40.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.5% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.5% | 11.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.89 | $2.35 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | $2.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $2.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $2.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $2.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $2.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $1.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $740.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $17.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $740.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $988.5M | $743.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $791.1M | $696.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $754.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $757.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $401.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $503.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $823.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | $17.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $18.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $13.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $12.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $333.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $332.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 55.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.36× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $875.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $333.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $290.3M | $144.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | $218.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.4M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.3M | $124.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.3M | $160.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.5M | $138.3M |
| Q1 26 | $332.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $288.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $236.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 55.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 48.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.27× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.32× | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | 1.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.30× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.53× | 3.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXEL
| Cabometyx | $544.7M | 91% |
| Collaboration | $52.1M | 9% |
| Collaborative Arrangementwith Takeda | $5.9M | 1% |
| Cometriq | $1.8M | 0% |
GATX
| Lease revenue | $400.7M | 92% |
| Other revenue | $36.0M | 8% |
