vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (FYBR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.9× Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.). Expeditors International runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -5.0%, a 12.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs -3.3%). Expeditors International produced more free cash flow last quarter ($270.3M vs $-315.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Expeditors International's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is an American telecommunications company with a fiber-optic network and cloud-based services owned by Verizon. It was previously known as Citizens Utilities Co., Citizens Communications Co., and Frontier Communications Corp.
EXPD vs FYBR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $-76.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | 7.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | $-0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | $-76.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $-123.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | $-64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $-118.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $-82.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $-123.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 65.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | -8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | -4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $336.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $4.7B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $21.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $336.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $412.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $506.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $750.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $21.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $21.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $20.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $20.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $20.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $20.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $20.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $504.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | $-315.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | -20.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 53.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | $-1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $504.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $477.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | $519.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $294.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $374.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | $335.0M |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | $-368.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | $-238.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | $-498.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | $-81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | $-252.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | $-331.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | -20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | -24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | -15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | -22.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 53.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 55.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 53.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 46.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | 335.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
FYBR
| Consumer | $826.0M | 54% |
| Business And Wholesale | $707.0M | 46% |
