vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.4× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 7.0%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -3.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $270.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Expeditors International's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
EXPD vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
