vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Extra Space Storage (EXR) and HEXCEL CORP (HXL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Extra Space Storage is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($856.0M vs $501.5M, roughly 1.7× HEXCEL CORP). Extra Space Storage runs the higher net margin — 28.2% vs 7.4%, a 20.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HEXCEL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.9% vs 4.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Extra Space Storage's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Extra Space Storage Inc. is an American real estate investment trust headquartered in Cottonwood Heights, Utah that invests in self storage facilities. The company rents storage units, including climate controlled units, drive-up units, lockers, boat storage, RV storage and business storage under the brands Extra Space Storage, Life Storage, and Storage Express. As of March 28, 2024 the company owned and/or operated 3,714 locations in 43 states, and Washington, D.C. comprising approximately 2.
Hexcel Corporation is an American public industrial materials company, based in Stamford, Connecticut. The company develops and manufactures structural materials. Hexcel was formed from the combination of California Reinforced Plastics, Ciba Composites and Hercules Composites Products Division. The company sells its products in commercial, military and recreational markets for use in commercial and military aircraft, space launch vehicles and satellites, wind turbine blades, sports equipment ...
EXR vs HXL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $856.0M | $501.5M |
| Net Profit | $241.0M | $37.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | 42.9% | 11.5% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.4% | 9.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.0% | 29.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.14 | $0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $856.0M | $501.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $857.5M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $858.5M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $841.6M | $489.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $820.0M | $456.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $821.9M | $473.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.8M | $456.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $810.7M | $500.4M |
| Q1 26 | $241.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $287.4M | $46.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.0M | $20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.7M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.9M | $28.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $262.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.9M | $50.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 73.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.6% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 72.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.1% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.7% | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | 42.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.14 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.91 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $139.0M | $54.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $998.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $29.1B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.79× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $139.0M | $54.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $138.9M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.9M | $90.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.0M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.6M | $89.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.2M | $125.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.9M | $98.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $75.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $998.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $29.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.8B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXR
| Property rental | $733.2M | 86% |
| Tenant reinsurance | $89.1M | 10% |
| Management fees and other income | $33.7M | 4% |
HXL
Segment breakdown not available.
