vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of National Vision Holdings, Inc. (EYE) and GRIFFON CORP (GFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRIFFON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($649.1M vs $487.3M, roughly 1.3× National Vision Holdings, Inc.). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 0.7%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, National Vision Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 2.6%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $30.3M). Over the past eight quarters, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.6% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Vision Research is an international company that manufactures high-speed digital cameras based in Wayne, New Jersey. Their cameras are marketed under the Phantom brand, and are used in a broad variety of industries including: defense, industrial product development, manufacturing, automotive, scientific research, and entertainment. Vision Research is a business unit of the Materials Analysis Division of Ametek Inc., a global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices.
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
EYE vs GFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $487.3M | $649.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.4M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 139.8% | -9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $1.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $487.3M | $662.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $486.4M | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $510.3M | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.3M | $632.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $451.5M | $659.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.7M | $647.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.8M | $672.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.6M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.5M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $64.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | -20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.8% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $-2.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.18 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.36 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.15 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.0M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $236.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $858.8M | $108.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $107.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.0M | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.9M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.2M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $179.5M | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.1M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $248.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $448.6M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $858.8M | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $850.6M | $63.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.2M | $214.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $816.3M | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $840.0M | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $843.4M | $223.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.3M | $202.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.30× | 22.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 7.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.30× | 6.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.17× | 6.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.53× | 7.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.6M | $107.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.3M | $99.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.2% | 15.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.83× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $83.0M | $278.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.3M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.9M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.5M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.0M | $39.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $99.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.3M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.4M | $114.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.83× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.27× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.05× | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EYE
Segment breakdown not available.
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |