vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EZCORP INC (EZPW) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EZCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.0M vs $336.0M, roughly 1.1× Federal Realty Investment Trust). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 11.6%, a 27.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EZCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.3% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, EZCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (15.6% CAGR vs 6.5%).
EZCORP, Inc. is an American pawn shop operator based in Austin, Texas which provides services across the United States and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange and is the second largest pawn shop operator in the U.S. after Cash America International.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
EZPW vs FRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $382.0M | $336.0M |
| Net Profit | $44.3M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 53.8% |
| Net Margin | 11.6% | 38.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.3% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.8% | 103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $382.0M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.8M | $322.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.0M | $311.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.3M | $309.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $320.2M | $311.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $294.6M | $303.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.4M | $296.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.7M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.5M | $155.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $63.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2M | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.9M | $112.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | $1.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $1.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $465.9M | $107.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $518.6M | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $9.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $465.9M | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $469.5M | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $472.1M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $505.2M | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.5M | $123.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.5M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.0M | $103.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $518.6M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $518.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $517.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $620.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $990.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $851.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $823.9M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $801.5M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $39.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $121.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.1M | $622.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.8M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $574.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3M | $144.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.7M | $169.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.45× | 2.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.84× | 8.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.85× | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EZPW
| Merchandise | $210.1M | 55% |
| Pawn Service | $131.9M | 35% |
| Jewelry Scrap | $39.9M | 10% |
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.