vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Diamondback Energy (FANG) and RYDER SYSTEM INC (R). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Diamondback Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $3.1B, roughly 1.1× RYDER SYSTEM INC). RYDER SYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs -43.2%, a 46.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RYDER SYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.0% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Diamondback Energy's revenue compounded faster (23.1% CAGR vs -0.9%).

Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.

Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.

FANG vs R — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FANG
FANG
1.1× larger
FANG
$3.4B
$3.1B
R
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
R
R
+10.0% gap
R
1.0%
-9.0%
FANG
Higher net margin
R
R
46.2% more per $
R
3.0%
-43.2%
FANG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FANG
FANG
Annualised
FANG
23.1%
-0.9%
R

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FANG
FANG
R
R
Revenue
$3.4B
$3.1B
Net Profit
$-1.5B
$93.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-82.4%
Net Margin
-43.2%
3.0%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
1.0%
Net Profit YoY
-235.8%
-5.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-4.99
$2.34

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
$3.1B
Q4 25
$3.4B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$3.1B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$3.2B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$3.2B
Net Profit
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
$93.0M
Q4 25
$-1.5B
$132.0M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$138.0M
Q2 25
$699.0M
$131.0M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$98.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$135.0M
Q3 24
$659.0M
$142.0M
Q2 24
$837.0M
$127.0M
Operating Margin
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
Q4 25
-82.4%
5.6%
Q3 25
31.5%
6.0%
Q2 25
31.0%
5.8%
Q1 25
41.3%
4.3%
Q4 24
38.0%
5.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
5.9%
Q2 24
46.6%
5.6%
Net Margin
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
3.0%
Q4 25
-43.2%
4.2%
Q3 25
25.9%
4.4%
Q2 25
19.0%
4.1%
Q1 25
34.7%
3.1%
Q4 24
28.9%
4.2%
Q3 24
24.9%
4.5%
Q2 24
33.7%
4.0%
EPS (diluted)
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
$2.34
Q4 25
$-4.99
$3.22
Q3 25
$3.51
$3.32
Q2 25
$2.38
$3.13
Q1 25
$4.83
$2.27
Q4 24
$3.40
$3.09
Q3 24
$3.19
$3.24
Q2 24
$4.66
$2.84

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FANG
FANG
R
R
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$104.0M
$182.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$13.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$37.0B
$2.9B
Total Assets
$71.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.37×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
$182.0M
Q4 25
$104.0M
$198.0M
Q3 25
$159.0M
$189.0M
Q2 25
$219.0M
$180.0M
Q1 25
$1.8B
$151.0M
Q4 24
$161.0M
$154.0M
Q3 24
$370.0M
$162.0M
Q2 24
$6.9B
$164.0M
Total Debt
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
Q4 25
$13.7B
$6.8B
Q3 25
$15.8B
$7.3B
Q2 25
$15.1B
$7.0B
Q1 25
$13.0B
$6.7B
Q4 24
$12.1B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$11.9B
$6.6B
Q2 24
$12.0B
$6.5B
Stockholders' Equity
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
$2.9B
Q4 25
$37.0B
$3.1B
Q3 25
$39.1B
$3.1B
Q2 25
$38.9B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$38.5B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$37.7B
$3.1B
Q3 24
$37.4B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$17.4B
$3.1B
Total Assets
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
Q4 25
$71.1B
$16.4B
Q3 25
$76.2B
$16.5B
Q2 25
$71.9B
$16.5B
Q1 25
$70.1B
$16.4B
Q4 24
$67.3B
$16.7B
Q3 24
$65.7B
$16.5B
Q2 24
$35.6B
$16.4B
Debt / Equity
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.37×
2.24×
Q3 25
0.41×
2.35×
Q2 25
0.39×
2.27×
Q1 25
0.34×
2.21×
Q4 24
0.32×
2.14×
Q3 24
0.32×
2.17×
Q2 24
0.69×
2.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FANG
FANG
R
R
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.3B
$583.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$273.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
13.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.27×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$595.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
$583.0M
Q4 25
$2.3B
$749.0M
Q3 25
$2.4B
$442.0M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$752.0M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$651.0M
Q4 24
$2.3B
$558.0M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$629.0M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$552.0M
Free Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
$273.0M
Q4 25
$344.0M
Q3 25
$-85.0M
Q2 25
$63.0M
Q1 25
$137.0M
Q4 24
$-201.0M
Q3 24
$30.0M
Q2 24
$-87.0M
FCF Margin
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
8.7%
Q4 25
10.8%
Q3 25
-2.7%
Q2 25
2.0%
Q1 25
4.4%
Q4 24
-6.3%
Q3 24
0.9%
Q2 24
-2.7%
Capex Intensity
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
13.7%
Q4 25
12.8%
Q3 25
16.6%
Q2 25
21.6%
Q1 25
16.4%
Q4 24
23.8%
Q3 24
18.9%
Q2 24
20.1%
Cash Conversion
FANG
FANG
R
R
Q1 26
6.27×
Q4 25
5.67×
Q3 25
2.34×
3.20×
Q2 25
2.40×
5.74×
Q1 25
1.68×
6.64×
Q4 24
2.18×
4.13×
Q3 24
1.83×
4.43×
Q2 24
1.83×
4.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FANG
FANG

Oil Explorationand Production$2.7B81%
Oil Purchased$308.0M9%
Natural Gas Liquids Production$293.0M9%
Natural Gas Production$4.0M0%

R
R

Fleet Management Solutions$1.5B47%
ChoiceLease$878.0M28%
Dedicated Transportation Solutions$553.0M18%
Commercial rental$211.0M7%

Related Comparisons