vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Diamondback Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.6× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -43.2%, a 59.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Diamondback Energy's revenue compounded faster (23.1% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
FANG vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.4B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-1.5B | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | -82.4% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | -43.2% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.0% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -235.8% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.99 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.5B | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $837.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -82.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.6% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -43.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.99 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.51 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.38 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.83 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.40 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.19 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.66 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $104.0M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.7B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $37.0B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $71.1B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.0M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.0M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.0B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.9B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.7B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.4B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.1B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.3B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.7B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.6B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.18× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.83× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.83× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FANG
| Oil Explorationand Production | $2.7B | 81% |
| Oil Purchased | $308.0M | 9% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Production | $293.0M | 9% |
| Natural Gas Production | $4.0M | 0% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
