vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Diamondback Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.3× Vertiv Holdings Co). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -43.2%, a 57.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Diamondback Energy's revenue compounded faster (23.1% CAGR vs 16.5%).

Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

FANG vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FANG
FANG
1.3× larger
FANG
$3.4B
$2.6B
VRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+39.2% gap
VRT
30.1%
-9.0%
FANG
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
57.9% more per $
VRT
14.7%
-43.2%
FANG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FANG
FANG
Annualised
FANG
23.1%
16.5%
VRT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$3.4B
$2.6B
Net Profit
$-1.5B
$390.1M
Gross Margin
37.7%
Operating Margin
-82.4%
Net Margin
-43.2%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
-235.8%
137.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-4.99
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$3.4B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.0B
Net Profit
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$390.1M
Q4 25
$-1.5B
$445.6M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$398.5M
Q2 25
$699.0M
$324.2M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$164.5M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$147.0M
Q3 24
$659.0M
$176.6M
Q2 24
$837.0M
$178.1M
Gross Margin
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
37.7%
Q4 25
38.9%
Q3 25
37.8%
Q2 25
34.0%
Q1 25
33.7%
Q4 24
37.1%
Q3 24
36.5%
Q2 24
38.0%
Operating Margin
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
-82.4%
20.1%
Q3 25
31.5%
19.3%
Q2 25
31.0%
16.8%
Q1 25
41.3%
14.3%
Q4 24
38.0%
19.5%
Q3 24
26.8%
17.9%
Q2 24
46.6%
17.2%
Net Margin
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
14.7%
Q4 25
-43.2%
15.5%
Q3 25
25.9%
14.9%
Q2 25
19.0%
12.3%
Q1 25
34.7%
8.1%
Q4 24
28.9%
6.3%
Q3 24
24.9%
8.5%
Q2 24
33.7%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0.99
Q4 25
$-4.99
$1.14
Q3 25
$3.51
$1.02
Q2 25
$2.38
$0.83
Q1 25
$4.83
$0.42
Q4 24
$3.40
$0.38
Q3 24
$3.19
$0.46
Q2 24
$4.66
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$104.0M
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$13.7B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$37.0B
$4.2B
Total Assets
$71.1B
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.37×
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$104.0M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$159.0M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$219.0M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$1.8B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$161.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$370.0M
$908.7M
Q2 24
$6.9B
$579.7M
Total Debt
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$13.7B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$15.8B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$15.1B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$13.0B
$2.9B
Q4 24
$12.1B
$2.9B
Q3 24
$11.9B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$12.0B
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$37.0B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$39.1B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$38.9B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$38.5B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$37.7B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$37.4B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$17.4B
$1.5B
Total Assets
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$13.4B
Q4 25
$71.1B
$12.2B
Q3 25
$76.2B
$10.8B
Q2 25
$71.9B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$70.1B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$67.3B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$65.7B
$8.9B
Q2 24
$35.6B
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.37×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.41×
0.83×
Q2 25
0.39×
0.93×
Q1 25
0.34×
1.10×
Q4 24
0.32×
1.20×
Q3 24
0.32×
1.62×
Q2 24
0.69×
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.3B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.3B
$978.9M
Q3 25
$2.4B
$508.7M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$322.9M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$303.3M
Q4 24
$2.3B
$425.2M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$378.2M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$652.8M
Q4 25
$885.6M
Q3 25
$463.5M
Q2 25
$277.9M
Q1 25
$266.8M
Q4 24
$364.5M
Q3 24
$341.8M
Q2 24
$344.3M
FCF Margin
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
24.6%
Q4 25
30.8%
Q3 25
17.3%
Q2 25
10.5%
Q1 25
13.1%
Q4 24
15.5%
Q3 24
16.5%
Q2 24
17.6%
Capex Intensity
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
4.2%
Q4 25
3.2%
Q3 25
1.7%
Q2 25
1.7%
Q1 25
1.8%
Q4 24
2.6%
Q3 24
1.8%
Q2 24
1.7%
Cash Conversion
FANG
FANG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.20×
Q3 25
2.34×
1.28×
Q2 25
2.40×
1.00×
Q1 25
1.68×
1.84×
Q4 24
2.18×
2.89×
Q3 24
1.83×
2.14×
Q2 24
1.83×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FANG
FANG

Oil Explorationand Production$2.7B81%
Oil Purchased$308.0M9%
Natural Gas Liquids Production$293.0M9%
Natural Gas Production$4.0M0%

VRT
VRT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons