vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and REPUBLIC BANCORP INC (RBCAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fat Brands, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($140.0M vs $94.3M, roughly 1.5× REPUBLIC BANCORP INC). REPUBLIC BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 24.2% vs -41.6%, a 65.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, REPUBLIC BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -2.3%). REPUBLIC BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($161.1M vs $-16.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Fat Brands, Inc's revenue compounded faster (-6.1% CAGR vs -11.5%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Republic Bancorp Inc. (Kentucky) is a U.S. regional banking holding company that provides a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including personal deposit accounts, consumer loans, business financing, mortgage products, and wealth management solutions. It mainly serves individual consumers and small to medium-sized enterprises in Kentucky and adjacent U.S. states.

FAT vs RBCAA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FAT
FAT
1.5× larger
FAT
$140.0M
$94.3M
RBCAA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RBCAA
RBCAA
+7.7% gap
RBCAA
5.3%
-2.3%
FAT
Higher net margin
RBCAA
RBCAA
65.8% more per $
RBCAA
24.2%
-41.6%
FAT
More free cash flow
RBCAA
RBCAA
$178.0M more FCF
RBCAA
$161.1M
$-16.9M
FAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FAT
FAT
Annualised
FAT
-6.1%
-11.5%
RBCAA

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Revenue
$140.0M
$94.3M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$22.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-12.4%
29.3%
Net Margin
-41.6%
24.2%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
5.3%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
20.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
$94.3M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$93.5M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$93.8M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$135.8M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$89.5M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$88.1M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$86.9M
Q1 24
$152.0M
$120.3M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
$22.8M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$29.7M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$31.5M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$47.3M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$19.0M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$26.5M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$25.2M
Q1 24
$-38.3M
$30.6M
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
29.3%
Q3 25
-12.4%
40.4%
Q2 25
-10.6%
43.0%
Q1 25
-6.0%
44.1%
Q4 24
-27.1%
25.8%
Q3 24
-6.2%
38.4%
Q2 24
-1.8%
37.0%
Q1 24
-0.9%
32.2%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
24.2%
Q3 25
-41.6%
31.8%
Q2 25
-36.9%
33.5%
Q1 25
-32.4%
34.8%
Q4 24
-46.4%
21.2%
Q3 24
-31.2%
30.1%
Q2 24
-25.9%
29.0%
Q1 24
-25.2%
25.4%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-3.39
Q2 25
$-3.17
Q1 25
$-2.73
Q4 24
$-4.06
Q3 24
$-2.74
Q2 24
$-2.43
Q1 24
$-2.37

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$220.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$1.1B
Total Assets
$1.2B
$7.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
$220.0M
Q3 25
$484.2M
Q2 25
$484.8M
Q1 25
$793.0M
Q4 24
$432.2M
Q3 24
$530.9M
Q2 24
$400.1M
Q1 24
$546.4M
Total Debt
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$992.0M
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$979.7M
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$955.4M
Q1 24
$-296.8M
$935.6M
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
$7.0B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$7.0B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$7.0B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$7.1B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$6.8B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$6.7B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$6.6B
Q1 24
$1.4B
$6.9B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
$168.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
$161.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
170.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
7.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
7.37×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M
$288.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
$168.2M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$33.3M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$8.4M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$93.2M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$149.0M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$51.3M
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$4.0M
Q1 24
$-28.4M
$71.2M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
$161.1M
Q3 25
$-16.9M
$30.8M
Q2 25
$-29.3M
$5.2M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
$91.6M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
$143.2M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
$49.8M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$2.7M
Q1 24
$-32.5M
$69.1M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
170.9%
Q3 25
-12.1%
32.9%
Q2 25
-20.0%
5.5%
Q1 25
-12.5%
67.4%
Q4 24
-7.6%
160.0%
Q3 24
-7.7%
56.5%
Q2 24
-16.1%
3.1%
Q1 24
-21.4%
57.5%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
7.5%
Q3 25
1.7%
2.6%
Q2 25
1.6%
3.5%
Q1 25
3.2%
1.2%
Q4 24
0.4%
6.5%
Q3 24
5.5%
1.7%
Q2 24
6.7%
1.5%
Q1 24
2.7%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
RBCAA
RBCAA
Q4 25
7.37×
Q3 25
1.12×
Q2 25
0.27×
Q1 25
1.97×
Q4 24
7.84×
Q3 24
1.93×
Q2 24
0.16×
Q1 24
2.33×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

RBCAA
RBCAA

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons