vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fat Brands, Inc (FAT) and RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC (RLGT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($232.1M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.7× Fat Brands, Inc). RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 2.3% vs -41.6%, a 43.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fat Brands, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.3% vs -12.3%). RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.6M vs $-16.9M). Over the past eight quarters, RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -6.1%).

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. is a leading third-party logistics provider offering end-to-end supply chain solutions, domestic and international freight forwarding, warehousing, and last-mile delivery services. It primarily serves North American markets, with key client segments including retail, manufacturing, e-commerce, and industrial sectors, helping businesses optimize logistics workflows and cut operational costs.

FAT vs RLGT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RLGT
RLGT
1.7× larger
RLGT
$232.1M
$140.0M
FAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FAT
FAT
+9.9% gap
FAT
-2.3%
-12.3%
RLGT
Higher net margin
RLGT
RLGT
43.9% more per $
RLGT
2.3%
-41.6%
FAT
More free cash flow
RLGT
RLGT
$28.5M more FCF
RLGT
$11.6M
$-16.9M
FAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RLGT
RLGT
Annualised
RLGT
12.1%
-6.1%
FAT

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Revenue
$140.0M
$232.1M
Net Profit
$-58.2M
$5.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-12.4%
3.2%
Net Margin
-41.6%
2.3%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
-12.3%
Net Profit YoY
-30.1%
-18.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.39
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$232.1M
Q3 25
$140.0M
$226.7M
Q2 25
$146.8M
$220.6M
Q1 25
$142.0M
$214.0M
Q4 24
$145.3M
$264.5M
Q3 24
$143.4M
$203.6M
Q2 24
$152.0M
$206.0M
Q1 24
$152.0M
$184.6M
Net Profit
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$5.3M
Q3 25
$-58.2M
$1.3M
Q2 25
$-54.2M
$4.9M
Q1 25
$-46.0M
$2.5M
Q4 24
$-67.4M
$6.5M
Q3 24
$-44.8M
$3.4M
Q2 24
$-39.4M
$4.8M
Q1 24
$-38.3M
$-703.0K
Operating Margin
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
3.2%
Q3 25
-12.4%
0.9%
Q2 25
-10.6%
2.4%
Q1 25
-6.0%
1.6%
Q4 24
-27.1%
3.3%
Q3 24
-6.2%
1.9%
Q2 24
-1.8%
2.4%
Q1 24
-0.9%
-0.5%
Net Margin
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
2.3%
Q3 25
-41.6%
0.6%
Q2 25
-36.9%
2.2%
Q1 25
-32.4%
1.2%
Q4 24
-46.4%
2.4%
Q3 24
-31.2%
1.7%
Q2 24
-25.9%
2.3%
Q1 24
-25.2%
-0.4%
EPS (diluted)
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$0.11
Q3 25
$-3.39
$0.03
Q2 25
$-3.17
$0.10
Q1 25
$-2.73
$0.05
Q4 24
$-4.06
$0.13
Q3 24
$-2.74
$0.07
Q2 24
$-2.43
$0.11
Q1 24
$-2.37
$-0.02

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$31.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-585.8M
$229.8M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$439.4M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$31.9M
Q3 25
$28.1M
Q2 25
$22.9M
Q1 25
$19.0M
Q4 24
$19.9M
Q3 24
$10.4M
Q2 24
$24.9M
Q1 24
$31.2M
Total Debt
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$229.8M
Q3 25
$-585.8M
$225.7M
Q2 25
$-536.5M
$226.0M
Q1 25
$-493.9M
$218.2M
Q4 24
$-455.7M
$214.4M
Q3 24
$-386.1M
$212.4M
Q2 24
$-338.6M
$209.4M
Q1 24
$-296.8M
$206.0M
Total Assets
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$439.4M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$445.3M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$426.8M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$414.5M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$386.8M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$375.3M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$371.2M
Q1 24
$1.4B
$364.0M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-14.5M
$12.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.9M
$11.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-12.1%
5.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.7%
0.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.33×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-75.0M
$8.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$12.4M
Q3 25
$-14.5M
$2.5M
Q2 25
$-26.9M
$3.1M
Q1 25
$-13.2M
$-5.7M
Q4 24
$-10.4M
$15.7M
Q3 24
$-3.2M
$205.0K
Q2 24
$-14.2M
$1.3M
Q1 24
$-28.4M
$3.9M
Free Cash Flow
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
$11.6M
Q3 25
$-16.9M
$977.0K
Q2 25
$-29.3M
$2.2M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
$-6.4M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
$14.1M
Q3 24
$-11.1M
$-1.9M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$-185.0K
Q1 24
$-32.5M
$1.8M
FCF Margin
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
5.0%
Q3 25
-12.1%
0.4%
Q2 25
-20.0%
1.0%
Q1 25
-12.5%
-3.0%
Q4 24
-7.6%
5.3%
Q3 24
-7.7%
-0.9%
Q2 24
-16.1%
-0.1%
Q1 24
-21.4%
1.0%
Capex Intensity
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
0.3%
Q3 25
1.7%
0.7%
Q2 25
1.6%
0.4%
Q1 25
3.2%
0.3%
Q4 24
0.4%
0.6%
Q3 24
5.5%
1.0%
Q2 24
6.7%
0.7%
Q1 24
2.7%
1.2%
Cash Conversion
FAT
FAT
RLGT
RLGT
Q4 25
2.33×
Q3 25
1.90×
Q2 25
0.63×
Q1 25
-2.26×
Q4 24
2.43×
Q3 24
0.06×
Q2 24
0.26×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

RLGT
RLGT

Transferred Over Time$201.2M87%
Other$25.0M11%
Value Added Services$4.2M2%
Transferred At Point In Time$1.8M1%

Related Comparisons