vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fatpipe Inc (FATN) and NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fatpipe Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.5M, roughly 1.6× NSTS Bancorp, Inc.). NSTS Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 214.3% vs 7.6%, a 206.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fatpipe Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 3.0%).
NSTS Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company. It offers a comprehensive suite of retail and commercial banking products and services, including deposit accounts, personal loans, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individual consumers and small-to-medium enterprises in its regional operating areas.
FATN vs NSTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $2.5M |
| Net Profit | $310.7K | $135.0K |
| Gross Margin | 87.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 214.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 816.0% | 393.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $310.7K | $135.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-43.4K | $65.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $741.2K | $-258.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-328.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-46.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-326.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-246.0K |
| Q4 25 | 87.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | -10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 214.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | -10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.2M | $80.0M |
| Total Assets | $32.4M | $266.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.4M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $77.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.4M | $266.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.2M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | $276.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $282.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $278.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $268.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $265.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $240.9K | $4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 156.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.78× | 30.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $240.9K | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.8K | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-508.6K | $655.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-551.1K | $616.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 156.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 113.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.0% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -126.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 373.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -76.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.78× | 30.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FATN
| Products | $2.6M | 63% |
| Other | $1.5M | 37% |
NSTS
Segment breakdown not available.
