vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) and WillScot Holdings Corp (WSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $566.0M, roughly 1.9× WillScot Holdings Corp). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs -33.1%, a 40.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.4% vs -6.1%). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($183.7M vs $149.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
WillScot Holdings Corp is a leading provider of modular space solutions and portable storage services across North America. It serves a wide range of sectors including construction, commercial development, education, healthcare, government projects, and special events, offering flexible, scalable temporary and semi-permanent space solutions tailored to diverse client needs.
FBIN vs WSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $566.0M |
| Net Profit | $76.3M | $-187.3M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | -32.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | -33.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | -6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.3% | -310.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $-1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $566.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $589.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $559.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $602.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $601.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $604.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $587.2M |
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | $-187.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.8M | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.3M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.0M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $-70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.9M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.4M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.0% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.0% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.9% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.6% | 54.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 54.0% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | -32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | -33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $-1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.83 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.42 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.84 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.76 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.0M | $14.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $856.3M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.07× | 4.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $381.1M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.8M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $359.7M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $856.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 4.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 3.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.16× | 3.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 3.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | 2.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $208.2M | $158.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $183.7M | $149.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.0% | 26.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.73× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $366.8M | $737.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.2M | $158.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.4M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.4M | $206.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.3M | $178.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $175.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.3M | $208.7M |
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.0M | $186.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.7M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.6M | $202.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.1M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.7M | $169.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.9M | $202.1M |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | 34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.89× | 4.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | 4.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.62× | 4.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.59× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.74× | 3.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FBIN
| Wholesale Retail Trade | $526.7M | 49% |
| Home Center Retailer | $257.1M | 24% |
| Security Segment | $165.8M | 15% |
| Other Retailer | $118.2M | 11% |
WSC
| Modular Space Leasing | $249.8M | 44% |
| Value Added Product And Services | $101.0M | 18% |
| Portable Storage Leasing | $83.0M | 15% |
| Delivery Revenue | $48.2M | 9% |
| Installation Revenue | $45.0M | 8% |
| Rental Units | $19.7M | 3% |
| New Units | $15.5M | 3% |
| Value Added Services | $10.3M | 2% |
| Other Leasing Related Products And Services | $3.8M | 1% |
