vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (FBIZ) and NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.3M vs $23.6M, roughly 1.9× NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP). FIRST BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 27.5% vs -677.3%, a 704.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 8.5%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs 8.0%).
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is an American bank holding company and financial services corporation based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Its banking subsidiary, PNC Bank, operates in 27 states and the District of Columbia, with 2,629 branches and 9,523 ATMs. PNC Bank is one of the largest banks in the US by assets and by number of branches, deposits, and ATMs.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
FBIZ vs NEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.3M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | $12.2M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.0% |
| Net Margin | 27.5% | -677.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.2% | -133.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.44 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.1M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $20.1M |
| Q1 26 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $-521.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.0% | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.2% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.8% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.6% | 32.6% |
| Q1 26 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.6% | -677.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.57 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.23 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $265.8M | $26.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $531.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $505.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $265.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.6M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $157.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $13.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $514.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $514.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $410.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $371.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $344.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $312.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $505.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $492.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $494.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $383.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $27.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.1M | $5.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 144.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 139.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | 3.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.01× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.99× | 7.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.25× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
