vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST BANCORP (FBNC) and GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.1M vs $89.6M, roughly 1.2× FIRST BANCORP). FIRST BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 22.7% vs -1.4%, a 24.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.7% vs -7.3%).
First Bancorp is an American bank holding company headquartered in Southern Pines, North Carolina, that operates as First Bank in North Carolina and South Carolina.
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
FBNC vs GDYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $89.6M | $104.1M |
| Net Profit | $20.4M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | 61.7% |
| Net Margin | 22.7% | -1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.3% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.0% | -150.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.49 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $104.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.0M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.8M | $100.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.7M | $83.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $306.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.6M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.4M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.7M | $-817.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 61.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.49 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.93 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.88 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.70 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $327.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $92.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $530.1M |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $605.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.06× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $327.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $342.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $338.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $334.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $530.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $542.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $537.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $532.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $517.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $517.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $400.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $388.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $612.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $613.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $608.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $590.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $592.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2B | $477.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1B | $443.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $48.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 53.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $182.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.7M | $10.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.6% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.44× | 5.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.19× | 2.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | 3.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.