vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST COMMUNITY CORP (FCCO) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $20.6M, roughly 1.2× FIRST COMMUNITY CORP). On growth, FIRST COMMUNITY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs 2.1%). FIRST COMMUNITY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($17.6M vs $1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST COMMUNITY CORP's revenue compounded faster (16.2% CAGR vs 10.5%).
United Community is an American bank. United is one of the largest full-service financial institutions in the Southeast, with $27.7 billion in assets and 200 offices in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. In addition to its presence in the Southeast, United Community is the largest bank headquartered in South Carolina by total asset size.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
FCCO vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.6M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.0% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.5M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.3M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.3M | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.2% | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.9% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.5% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.8% | -51.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | -54.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.67 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $167.6M | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $167.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.6M | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.0M | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.5M | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $143.3M | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.2M | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.5M | $164.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $177.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.7M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $17.6M | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 85.3% | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $32.4M | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-236.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-292.0K | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | $624.4K |
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-454.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-634.0K | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $615.4K |
| Q4 25 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.0% | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.0% | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.81× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
