vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstCash Holdings, Inc. (FCFS) and SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (SEDG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($501.3M vs $335.4M, roughly 1.5× SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). FirstCash Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.8% vs -39.4%, a 60.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (70.9% vs 21.2%). Over the past eight quarters, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 16.9%).
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. is an American pawnshop company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas which operates retail pawn stores in the U.S. and Latin America. It is a publicly traded company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is an Israeli company that developed a DC optimized inverter system.
FCFS vs SEDG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $501.3M | $335.4M |
| Net Profit | $104.2M | $-132.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | 20.8% | -39.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.2% | 70.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.7% | 54.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.35 | $-2.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $501.3M | $335.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $411.0M | $340.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.1M | $289.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $219.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.7M | $196.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.1M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5M | $265.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $366.8M | $204.4M |
| Q4 25 | $104.2M | $-132.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $-50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.8M | $-124.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.6M | $-98.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.5M | $-287.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.8M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | $-130.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $-157.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -309.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | -39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.0% | -46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -134.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -471.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -85.0% |
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | -39.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | -44.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.2% | -146.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | -522.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | -49.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.7% | -77.0% |
| Q4 25 | $2.35 | $-2.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.86 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $-2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.87 | $-1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | $-5.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | $-21.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.08 | $-2.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.35 | $-2.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $125.2M | $493.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $427.5M |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $493.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.2M | $498.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.5M | $758.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.0M | $651.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $175.1M | $585.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $678.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.7M | $689.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.1M | $680.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $427.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $479.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $594.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $658.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $930.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.75× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.6M | $52.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $43.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.98× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $80.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $206.6M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.8M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.9M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.6M | $33.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.1M | $-89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.2M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.5M | $-217.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-136.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-243.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -58.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -119.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FCFS
| US Pawn Segment | $292.2M | 58% |
| Retail POS Payment Solutions | $209.8M | 42% |
SEDG
| Other | $197.7M | 59% |
| Europe Except Netherlands | $99.4M | 30% |
| Others | $38.2M | 11% |
