vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FTI CONSULTING, INC (FCN) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $983.3M, roughly 1.3× FTI CONSULTING, INC). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 5.9%, a 25.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 9.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 1.8%).

FTI Consulting is a business consultancy firm founded in 1982 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., United States. The company specializes in corporate finance and restructuring, economic consulting, forensic and litigation consulting, strategic communications, technology and strategy consulting. FTI Consulting employs more than 7,700 staff in 31 countries and is one of the largest financial consulting firms worldwide.

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.

FCN vs TER — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TER
TER
1.3× larger
TER
$1.3B
$983.3M
FCN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TER
TER
+77.6% gap
TER
87.0%
9.5%
FCN
Higher net margin
TER
TER
25.2% more per $
TER
31.1%
5.9%
FCN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TER
TER
Annualised
TER
32.6%
1.8%
FCN

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Revenue
$983.3M
$1.3B
Net Profit
$57.6M
$398.9M
Gross Margin
60.9%
Operating Margin
8.5%
36.9%
Net Margin
5.9%
31.1%
Revenue YoY
9.5%
87.0%
Net Profit YoY
-6.8%
EPS (diluted)
$1.90
$2.53

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$983.3M
$1.3B
Q4 25
$990.7M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$956.2M
$769.2M
Q2 25
$943.7M
$651.8M
Q1 25
$898.3M
$685.7M
Q4 24
$894.9M
$752.9M
Q3 24
$926.0M
$737.3M
Q2 24
$949.2M
$729.9M
Net Profit
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$57.6M
$398.9M
Q4 25
$54.5M
$257.2M
Q3 25
$82.8M
$119.6M
Q2 25
$71.7M
$78.4M
Q1 25
$61.8M
$98.9M
Q4 24
$49.7M
$146.3M
Q3 24
$66.5M
$145.6M
Q2 24
$83.9M
$186.3M
Gross Margin
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
60.9%
Q4 25
31.1%
57.2%
Q3 25
33.3%
58.4%
Q2 25
32.1%
57.2%
Q1 25
32.2%
60.6%
Q4 24
30.2%
59.4%
Q3 24
32.2%
59.2%
Q2 24
32.8%
58.3%
Operating Margin
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
8.5%
36.9%
Q4 25
9.4%
27.1%
Q3 25
12.3%
18.9%
Q2 25
10.5%
13.9%
Q1 25
8.8%
17.6%
Q4 24
5.9%
20.4%
Q3 24
9.8%
20.6%
Q2 24
11.0%
28.8%
Net Margin
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
5.9%
31.1%
Q4 25
5.5%
23.7%
Q3 25
8.7%
15.5%
Q2 25
7.6%
12.0%
Q1 25
6.9%
14.4%
Q4 24
5.6%
19.4%
Q3 24
7.2%
19.8%
Q2 24
8.8%
25.5%
EPS (diluted)
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$1.90
$2.53
Q4 25
$1.77
$1.62
Q3 25
$2.60
$0.75
Q2 25
$2.13
$0.49
Q1 25
$1.74
$0.61
Q4 24
$1.39
$0.89
Q3 24
$1.85
$0.89
Q2 24
$2.34
$1.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$198.3M
$241.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
Total Assets
$3.5B
$4.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$198.3M
$241.9M
Q4 25
$265.1M
$293.8M
Q3 25
$146.0M
$272.7M
Q2 25
$152.8M
$339.3M
Q1 25
$151.1M
$475.6M
Q4 24
$660.5M
$553.4M
Q3 24
$386.3M
$510.0M
Q2 24
$226.4M
$421.9M
Total Debt
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$0
Q3 24
Q2 24
$60.0M
Stockholders' Equity
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.7B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$2.8B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$2.8B
Q4 24
$2.3B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$2.3B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$2.7B
Total Assets
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$3.5B
$4.4B
Q4 25
$3.5B
$4.2B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$3.5B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$3.3B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$3.6B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.5B
$3.8B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$3.6B
Debt / Equity
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.00×
Q3 24
Q2 24
0.03×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-310.0M
$265.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-5.38×
0.66×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
$-310.0M
$265.1M
Q4 25
$359.8M
$281.6M
Q3 25
$201.9M
$49.0M
Q2 25
$55.7M
$182.1M
Q1 25
$-465.2M
$161.6M
Q4 24
$315.3M
$282.6M
Q3 24
$219.4M
$166.3M
Q2 24
$135.2M
$216.1M
Free Cash Flow
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
$351.4M
$218.8M
Q3 25
$187.0M
$2.4M
Q2 25
$38.3M
$131.7M
Q1 25
$-483.0M
$97.6M
Q4 24
$301.6M
$225.2M
Q3 24
$212.3M
$114.4M
Q2 24
$125.2M
$171.2M
FCF Margin
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
35.5%
20.2%
Q3 25
19.6%
0.3%
Q2 25
4.1%
20.2%
Q1 25
-53.8%
14.2%
Q4 24
33.7%
29.9%
Q3 24
22.9%
15.5%
Q2 24
13.2%
23.5%
Capex Intensity
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.8%
5.8%
Q3 25
1.6%
6.1%
Q2 25
1.8%
7.7%
Q1 25
2.0%
9.3%
Q4 24
1.5%
7.6%
Q3 24
0.8%
7.0%
Q2 24
1.1%
6.1%
Cash Conversion
FCN
FCN
TER
TER
Q1 26
-5.38×
0.66×
Q4 25
6.60×
1.09×
Q3 25
2.44×
0.41×
Q2 25
0.78×
2.32×
Q1 25
-7.52×
1.63×
Q4 24
6.34×
1.93×
Q3 24
3.30×
1.14×
Q2 24
1.61×
1.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons