vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZIPRECRUITER, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($111.7M vs $85.1M, roughly 1.3× 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.). 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs -0.7%, a 23.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8508900.0% vs 0.6%). 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.5M vs $7.6M). Over the past eight quarters, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5412.6% CAGR vs -4.4%).
4D Molecular Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the research and development of targeted adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies. Its core product candidates address unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, cardiology, and pulmonary disease segments, serving global patient populations with rare and common hard-to-treat conditions.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
FDMT vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $85.1M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $19.4M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 22.8% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 8508900.0% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 139.1% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $85.1M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.0K | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0K | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0K | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0K | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0K | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0K | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.0K | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-56.9M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.7M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.8M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.4M | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -67983.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -396373.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -383007.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1704400.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -849120.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -136200.0% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -63195.6% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -364386.7% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342657.1% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1461433.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -699060.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -115717.9% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.01 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.98 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.86 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.79 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.63 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.66 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $402.7M | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $505.7M | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $566.7M | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $402.7M | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.1M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.2M | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.4M | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.9M | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.9M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.9M | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $525.9M | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | $505.7M | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.0M | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.9M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $469.7M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $510.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $552.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.6M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $566.7M | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $424.0M | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.6M | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $515.7M | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.4M | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.0M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $620.1M | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $629.9M | $662.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.6M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.5M | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 33.5% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-109.9M | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-43.4M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.8M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-134.6M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.2M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.1M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-43.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.4M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-138.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.6M | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.8M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 33.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -51765.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -289620.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -345635.7% | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13837100.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1038966.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -611840.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106421.4% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 101.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 440.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4507.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 378600.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59266.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6980.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2535.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FDMT
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
