vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.4M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.2× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs 10.5%, a 54.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs 8.3%). Over the past eight quarters, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 9.1%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
FEIM vs MITT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $20.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 67.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 65.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 121.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $57.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $560.7M |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $560.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $559.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $536.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $543.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $543.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $533.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $539.6M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $59.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $59.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | 3.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
MITT
Segment breakdown not available.
