vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC (PEBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.5M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.3× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs 10.5%, a 20.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs 5.6%). PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.0M vs $-1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 4.2%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC is a regional bank holding company headquartered in North Carolina, U.S. It offers a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, consumer and business loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving local residents, small and medium-sized enterprises, and community organizations across its operating areas in North Carolina.
FEIM vs PEBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $6.6M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 40.7% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 30.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 5.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | 86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | 23.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | $0.79 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | $0.72 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $58.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | $157.1M |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $149.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $144.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | $138.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | $130.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $124.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | $121.1M |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $21.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $20.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | 92.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | 3.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | $34.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | 92.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 98.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 3.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 5.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
PEBK
Segment breakdown not available.
